Lightroom and Aperture are both very popular image editing and management tools for photographers. However, Apple will retire* Aperture in 2015, and many users are already thinking about jumping ship to Lightroom. Apple Aperture. For the past several years, Aperture was the biggest competitor to Lightroom, even though it only works on Mac. But Apple decided to discontinue development and took the guts of Aperture and iPhoto to create a new app for managing photos that is simply called Photos. If you can't or don't want to install Lr on the Mac with Aperture just to do the conversion, take a look at Aperture Exporter. It can run on the Mac and export to say an external drive your Aperture library all set up for a relatively easy manual import into Lr on Windows. Photographs, Photographers and Photography. There is a whole series of blog posts behind this Lightroom/Aperture comparison at oreilly.com. Camera Raw and PS (running as fast as on my PC), plus the unalloyed joy of the Mac interface again, is a winning combination for me. I’ve since tried Aperture, and Capture One and iView, and find.
Every single day we are surrounded by unimaginable technology, and we all look forward to what's coming next. Yet when something new comes, we have a peculiar habit of trying to frame it in terms of what has gone before. So when rumors of Aperture first surfaced, the common reaction was to assume that this was Apple attempting to make their own version of Photoshop. Aperture was for editing photos, it did feature some tools that photographers know from Adobe's software. Apple's software wasn't Photoshop, it was a new class of app entirely.
Free Lightroom For Mac
It was for photographers to handle large numbers of photographs, to do the kind of processing and editing they need daily, and then to send these images on to clients. When you assume that Apple was trying to mimic Photoshop, you have to conclude that they failed immediately. The features in Aperture were the smallest fraction of what that image editor can do. Then Adobe released, a very similar idea to Aperture, and that seemed to validate the concept. There were key differences between the two but they both aimed to serve pro photographers. Adobe Lightroom succeeded and is still in use today.
Apple's Aperture is no longer in development or on sale. It's a surprising story because Aperture had much going for it. The Mac is the preferred computer of photographers across the world and Aperture addressed a genuine need. It's too simplistic to blame its failure on a handful of specific issues but as a whole those problems do mean that Aperture is a major Apple app that died. First sight Apple released Aperture 1.0 on October 19, 2005 and followed it before the end of the year with a bug-fixing 1.0.1., Apple said it was: 'the first all-in-one post production tool that provides everything photographers need after the shoot.'
The company also quoted Heinz Kluetmeier, a sports photographer known for shooting over 100 Sports Illustrated covers at the time. 'What amazed me about Aperture is that you can work directly with RAW files, you can loupe and stack them and it's almost instantaneous,' said Kluetmeier.
'I suspect that I'm going to stop shooting JPEGs. Aperture just blew me away.' While its features seem familiar today, the way that Aperture grouped photos into stacks or collections based on when they were taken was new.
It automated part of the process of working on a shoot. There was perhaps one more thing that made this a professional's app instead of a consumer's one -- it cost $499. Lightroom That 1.0.1 release of Aperture came on December 21, 2005 and then on January 9, 2006, Adobe released a beta of Lightroom for the Mac. It was only for the Mac then, too, so at the time it seemed like Adobe copying Aperture.
0 kommentar(er)
